Save the Day…The Modern Way!
Analogies
- here’s a thought-provoking one that makes sense and one for you to muse over:
Surveillance Cameras in Public Places are to Public Safety as Santa is to Toys.
What does this mean? Surveillance cameras provide public safety like Santa
Claus gives toys. Santa’s toys make children feel happy and feel that someone
cares about them; surveillance cameras in public places create a feeling of
safety for citizens and signify that the government cares about its citizens.
Furthermore, public surveillance cameras can alert the police of criminal
activity and save taxpayers millions of dollars while ensuring public safety.
Wouldn’t you vote yes for surveillance cameras in public places?
Surveillance cameras aren’t just there to watch the streets
of your town or city. They can give a sense of security to citizens. Think
about it, no one would go to a location where they know that robbers could be
lurking around each corner and get away with harassing you! Surveillance
cameras impede the minds of criminals. When these wicked people know that they
could easily be caught, they won’t take as much of a risk to commit crime –
resulting in less mischief altogether. This makes me feel safe wherever I am or
go. Wouldn’t you feel the same way too?
Surveillance cameras help crime-stoppers to prevent
wrongdoings from happening. Surveillance camera watchers can tell police when
something unusual happens. The authorities can be alerted before a crime
occurs. For example, if a suspicious bag laid in a subway platform and no one
claimed it, the police would have been alerted immediately to inspect the bag,
preventing a bomb from exploding and hurting innocent lives.
One can argue that purchasing these cameras is a waste of
money, but isn’t hiring police to patrol more costly? It takes more money to
pay policemen than it does to maintain cameras every year. Purchasing a good
surveillance camera costs around $100. A police officer’s salary averages $30
an hour! Do the math. Pay $100 for the camera or pay $720 a day for the patrol!
But who’s going to watch the surveillance video? You can hire surveillance
camera watchers at $580 a day. This still comes to less than hiring police
officers. Also, to patrol multiple areas, you need to hire a police officer for
each location. With surveillance cameras, a watcher can oversee several sites
at the same time. Surely, buying a camera is more astute.
When you are mauled, you want the person who hurt you to get
punish for committing a crime. You take him to court. There, you will need
evidence to prove this person had harmed you. Video footage from surveillance
cameras has been used to persecute criminals. If you have proof, it is likely
that the bad guy will go to jail. If you don’t, then he might walk free and can
continue doing harm to others. How would you feel if you knew the person who
ran his car into yours is on the loose?
Sociologists have found that cameras don’t reduce crime as
much as they say. They only prevent a few crimes every year. Well, what if
those violations weren’t videotaped? People could’ve been seriously injured or
killed! When you have a deceased person’s family to deal with, that’s not good.
Others say that the government should not be able to spy on us. If the police
limit cameras to high crime areas in public spaces, then it is not spying; in
fact, it can save my or your life.
“Guilty,”
The judge announced sternly. You, the innocent suspect is scared. What are they
talking about? What did you do? Then, a person bursts through the doors with a
USB. He plugs it into a projector and the screen shows a surveillance camera’s
video footage of the crime. Ha! It wasn’t you. You’re now safe. If this was
real life, wouldn’t you like to have someone bust through doors and save the
day the modern way? Wouldn’t you like to see the real criminal go to jail? It’s
possible with surveillance cameras!
7 comments:
Nicholas, I love your title. When I first read it, your title made me think of Superman. So, I thought your essay was going to be related to that. Boy, was I wrong and what a surprised! You definitely wrote a very convincing essay and even more so in your conclusion. Yeah, if surveillance cameras can put criminals in jail and save the innocent, I am all for it. : ) Excellent argumentative essay!
Great writing. It is the best I have seen. I am all for it. I wish I had a surveillance camera facing the front of my house so I could catch the person who did not pick up their dog's poop....
Viv
Surveillance cameras in public places are a good thing, as long as people are aware they exist. They can be very useful in preventing crimes, as well as investigating crimes after the fact. Good job; you made a very convincing argument for surveillance cameras, the positives outweigh any negatives there might be. I would like to remain anonymous, unless I'm being watched under surveillance.
I liked how you gave a lot of examples to support your main idea. Surveillance cameras are definitely a great idea! -Grace T
I liked your title as well. I do agree that it can be used to fight or deter crimes. However, I do not feel that we need to live in a world where we are being constantly watched. What would happen to our freedom ? Beside, if the criminals know the cameras are there, don't you think they would find ways to either sabotage the camera or hide their faces from the camera. As you pointed out, it is only useful if the watcher is doing his/her job to monitor the video. I like your conclusion though...I agree it can help to convict or exonerate someone of a crime....for that reason, I am for it.
Good job.....
I'm staying anonymous...hope no one is watching me write this :-)
Nick,
Your essay was very persuasive because it had creativity without lacking information. The introduction was attention grabbing and the comparison between the cost of hiring the policeman and buying surveillance cameras was a great argument. Also, your writing is mature and professional. Good job! :)
-assistantcoachkelly
Good essay but weird title
Post a Comment