Nicholas Ng's...

Save the Day…The Modern Way! 

Analogies - here’s a thought-provoking one that makes sense and one for you to muse over: Surveillance Cameras in Public Places are to Public Safety as Santa is to Toys. What does this mean? Surveillance cameras provide public safety like Santa Claus gives toys. Santa’s toys make children feel happy and feel that someone cares about them; surveillance cameras in public places create a feeling of safety for citizens and signify that the government cares about its citizens. Furthermore, public surveillance cameras can alert the police of criminal activity and save taxpayers millions of dollars while ensuring public safety. Wouldn’t you vote yes for surveillance cameras in public places?

Surveillance cameras aren’t just there to watch the streets of your town or city. They can give a sense of security to citizens. Think about it, no one would go to a location where they know that robbers could be lurking around each corner and get away with harassing you! Surveillance cameras impede the minds of criminals. When these wicked people know that they could easily be caught, they won’t take as much of a risk to commit crime – resulting in less mischief altogether. This makes me feel safe wherever I am or go. Wouldn’t you feel the same way too?

Surveillance cameras help crime-stoppers to prevent wrongdoings from happening. Surveillance camera watchers can tell police when something unusual happens. The authorities can be alerted before a crime occurs. For example, if a suspicious bag laid in a subway platform and no one claimed it, the police would have been alerted immediately to inspect the bag, preventing a bomb from exploding and hurting innocent lives.

One can argue that purchasing these cameras is a waste of money, but isn’t hiring police to patrol more costly? It takes more money to pay policemen than it does to maintain cameras every year. Purchasing a good surveillance camera costs around $100. A police officer’s salary averages $30 an hour! Do the math. Pay $100 for the camera or pay $720 a day for the patrol! But who’s going to watch the surveillance video? You can hire surveillance camera watchers at $580 a day. This still comes to less than hiring police officers. Also, to patrol multiple areas, you need to hire a police officer for each location. With surveillance cameras, a watcher can oversee several sites at the same time. Surely, buying a camera is more astute.

When you are mauled, you want the person who hurt you to get punish for committing a crime. You take him to court. There, you will need evidence to prove this person had harmed you. Video footage from surveillance cameras has been used to persecute criminals. If you have proof, it is likely that the bad guy will go to jail. If you don’t, then he might walk free and can continue doing harm to others. How would you feel if you knew the person who ran his car into yours is on the loose?

Sociologists have found that cameras don’t reduce crime as much as they say. They only prevent a few crimes every year. Well, what if those violations weren’t videotaped? People could’ve been seriously injured or killed! When you have a deceased person’s family to deal with, that’s not good. Others say that the government should not be able to spy on us. If the police limit cameras to high crime areas in public spaces, then it is not spying; in fact, it can save my or your life. 

“Guilty,” The judge announced sternly. You, the innocent suspect is scared. What are they talking about? What did you do? Then, a person bursts through the doors with a USB. He plugs it into a projector and the screen shows a surveillance camera’s video footage of the crime. Ha! It wasn’t you. You’re now safe. If this was real life, wouldn’t you like to have someone bust through doors and save the day the modern way? Wouldn’t you like to see the real criminal go to jail? It’s possible with surveillance cameras!

Parents: Get That Relaxing Time On The Couch!

It’s Mom and Dad on the court. It’s the Allowance-Ball National Finals. Mom is playing and representing for giving an allowance as a reward; Dad is for the Allowance-No-Matter-Whats. There’s two seconds on the clock and both Mom and Dad have a score of 98. Mom grabs the ball and eyes the basket from half court. A third time the attempt was made but this time, following the coach’s advice, Mom hurtled the ball thrown from half-court. The sand-green ball swishes through the rim and out of the net. The buzzer rings, indicating the game is over. Mom wins! Mom is right like always. Allowances given as rewards are actually better. They teach money management, you are paid for results, and that allowances given as rewards benefit everyone.

Paying children an allowance as a reward will teach money management. Nowadays, you have to spend your money wisely. If you invest too much money in stocks, you could end up losing all your money if you don’t invest right. If you spend too much money on unnecessary wants, you will be living in a dilapidated hovel. So how does an allowance that is given as a reward and not a weekly paycheck teach money management? Well, let’s say Bob gets $5 for washing the dishes. When you drop the five-dollar bill into his cupped hands, he beseeches you to take him to Toys’R’Us to spend his hard-earned cash on a small remote controlled car. A day later, his friend Tom asks Bob to the movies, but he is out of money. Now, the racecar is stuck in a big cardboard box with the rest of Bob’s toys... the toys that Bob doesn’t play with anymore. Money management would help Bob so that he doesn’t spend his money on whatever new toy comes out. Instead, he would think about what to spend his money on and that way, he could use his money wisely.

Allowances that are rewards teach kids that they are paid for results, not just effort. This means that if Bob doesn’t get the job done right, he doesn’t get his money. If Bob decided to wash the dishes but he wasn’t feeling so well and just tossed water onto the plates, he wouldn’t get his five dollars. Now that he learned his lesson, he knows that just because he tried, it doesn’t mean he gets rewarded for trying to do his chore. He actually has to complete his job successfully in order to receive his reward.

Do you think that rewards will only benefit your child? You are COMPLETELY wrong! If your child is doing chores for a reward, he is helping everyone. He is doing many chores, willingly helping you clean and helping you cut grass from dim dawn to dark. Your child has an adequate amount of money and you get to enjoy that relaxing moment on the living room couch that you have been longing for. Also, when your child gets his reward, he doesn’t have to spend it all. He could break up his reward money so that some of it goes to long term savings (for college), some go to short term savings (for a $100 pair of shoes), some go to charities, and some go to spending right away. Not only is your child helping himself, but also other people that you might not even know!!!

You’re probably still pondering if you should give your child a reward-based allowance. You may think that rewards will change your child’s mind so that when he does a good deed, he will want money in return. If your child does become greedy, he will have to do more chores. This will make him do the chores really quickly. Speed leads to poor quality. You and your intimidating eyes look upon him with annoyance, and though you taught him what to do and how to do it, you could not teach him to take his time. Admonish him that next time, if the same thing happens he will not get money. If a reward allowance will teach and benefit so much, what can go wrong? Your child won’t even be addicted to Ben Franklins! Start a reward-based allowance today! The couch will be your friend in a week guaranteed!

Written by Nicholas Ng